在真題中更容易找到考試出題規律，以下本站小編整理的託福寫作真題訓練題，希望對大家複習有所幫助，更多資訊請關注應屆畢業生網!
綜合寫作
READNING | LISTENING |
Inuktitut 語言沒有人說的語言 | |
1 調查說25％的16歲以下年輕人都不說這個語言了 | 1 這個survey不準確，通過face to face的調查很多人都說這個語言。年輕人不說這種語言是因為不講傳統，他們的'爺爺奶奶還是講這種語言的。 |
2 financial burden. 當地主要是漁業，漁業要賣給外國人，要用英語交流。 | 2 儘管很多國際的用英語，很多local的fishers都用I語。所以很多家長願意讓小孩兩種都學。 |
3 Media的影響。很多媒體都是用英文。 | 3 如果只看radio和TV，的確是英文。但是如果看看social media，大家還是說使用著用語言的。 |
獨立寫作
Independent Writing:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decision quickly; when a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people he lead. 2014. 8.22 NA
【拓展閱讀】託福寫作範文：政府保護自然環境應採取什麼措施
此題為三選一
What is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of environmental problems? Fund researches on new energy sources such as solar and wind power? Protect forests and natural wildlife species? Pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution.
三選一類題目會給出三個選項A, B, C讓學生去選擇一個。這種題的答題方法為開頭段-正文段第一段B好-正文段第二段B的另一個優點-正文段第三段B比A好/A的缺點和B比C好/C的缺點-結尾段。
2016年6月25日託福獨立寫作真題回顧
What one of the following is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of natural environment?
(1)fund research on new energy sources such as solar and wind power;
(2)preserve natural places such as forests and natural wildlife species.
(3)pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution produced by companies and industries
點睛：
題目大意：對政府來說，要想保護自然環境，政府最應該採取哪項措施：資助研究新能源，保護棲息地和動物，制定法規來減少公司的汙染排放。 此題目為三選一的題目，波波提醒各位小夥伴，對於這樣的題目，我們有兩點要做到：1.必須要清楚選出一個選項，2.三個選項在整篇文章論述中務必都要提到。只要能做到上述兩點即可，所以三選一題目的寫作結構非常靈活，下面是一種寫法，僅供參考。
託福獨立寫作範文：
Taking a panoromic view of human history, we can readily find that the natural environment plays an enormously important role in determing the future of each and every country. Given the great significance of clean environment, the general public as well as the governors begin to wonder which is the most essential action to protect the environment, among funding new energy research, preserving natural habitat or enacting strict laws. Towards such a long-running tug-of-war, I am inclined to argue that national governments should invest financial support in developing new energy sources.
Initially, spending more money in discovering new energy can radically solve the various environmental problems. As is common sense, the deteriorating environment is the result of the overexploitation of fossil fuels, including coal, oil and natural gas. To be specific, numerous chemical plants usually burn the coal to provide power for manufacturing all kinds of goods designed to satisfy the basic needs of the general public. As a result, a large amounts of industrial wastes are discharged to take a toll on the natural environment. Also, an increasing number of petrol-powered automobiles will definitely emit car exhause(e.g. fumes and toxic gas), which can increase the likelihood of the public suffering from respiratory diseases. All the above problems related to environment can be resolved by find new and clean energy like solar energy, wind power and tidal power. Undoubtedly, replacing the traditional energy with the new ones can dramatically decrease the pollution and contamination, thus leading to a better living environment. For example, once the cars uses the electricity instead of petrol, the air quality will improve to a large extent.
Secondly, there are conspicuous limitation of the other two options. As for preserving natural places, the effect of this practice is relatively restricted. To illustrate, the traditional energy sources are usually exploited and discovered in the natural places. Consequently, the preservation of natural places will hinder the access to various energy and thus impede the progress of the whole society. Also, the same logic applies to passing laws to reduce pollution. It is an indisputable fact that across the globe, many countries now are heaviely dependent on the industries and factories which produce pollutions. In other words, once the law of punishing these companies is enforced, these corporation may have to cut down their output and make less profits, even ending up going bankcrupt. Accordingly, the national economy and the living standard of the public will suffer too.
Factoring what has been discussed above, we can conclude that funding research of environmental friendly energy will be more preferable, because finding proper alternative energy is the key to solving the environmental problems comprehensively.
