人天天都學到一點東西，而往往所學到的是發現昨日學到的是錯的。以下是小編為大家搜尋整理的2017年託福寫作真題練習及答案解析，希望能給大家帶來幫助!更多精彩內容請及時關注我們應屆畢業生考試網!
綜合寫作
Topic議題：Mustangshas a negative influence on rangeland | ||
Reading | Listening | |
Sub-point 1 分論點1 | TheMustangswill overgraze grass, thus making it expose to rain. Wind would carry the topsoil. | Indeed the Mustangs would graze grass, but they only eat top of plant, so grass will grow again. Besides, fertilizer provided by Mustangs would aid plants’ growth. |
Sub-point2 分論點2 | The land has carrying capacity. | Horses hunt sheep, so the sheep’s population will be reduced. It will not exceed carrying capacity. |
Sub-point 3 分論點3 | Mustangs will degrade the water quality. Therefore, the juvenile fish can not survive. | It is not caused by Mustangs. There were beavers once. Building dam is good for young fish. However, people think that beavers will damage environment, thus killing them. Without beavers, young fish can not survive. |
Sample answer:
The writer and the speakerhave a debate on Mustangs. The writer believes that it will have a negativeinfluence on rangeland, which is opposed by the following lecture.
First, the writer claims thatthe Mustangs will overgraze grass, thus making it expose to rain. Wind wouldcarry the topsoil. While the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle, accordingto him/her, Indeed the Mustangs would graze grass, but they only eat top ofplant, so grass will grow again. Besides, fertilizer provided by Mustangs wouldaid plants’ growth.
Secondly, the passage statesthat the land has carrying capacity.. However, the speaker casts doubt on thisopinion by saying that Horses hunt sheep, so the sheep’s population will bereduced. It will not exceed carrying capacity.
Last, the writer argues that Mustangswill degrade the water quality. Therefore, the juvenile fish can not survive. Bycontrast, in accordance with the speaker, this claim does not hold water. It isnot caused by Mustangs. There were beavers once. Building dam is good for youngfish. However, people think that beavers will damage environment, thus killingthem. Without beavers, young fish can not survive.
獨立寫作：
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for the older to take risks and explore new things than young people. | |
題型類別: | 比較類 |
相關舊題： | 無 |
寫作思路： | 本次寫作題目也是相對比較簡單的話題，選擇單邊的同學注意段落內部適當進行雙方的比較。如果想不出三個互斥的分論點，可以選擇寫讓步的結構 |
寫作指導： | Agree: 單邊 1. 年長的人已經有一定的經濟實力，能夠有更多的資本去探索新的東西，因為很多新的事物需要投入更多的物力和財力。即使不成功，還是有一定的經濟基礎，能夠基本的維持自己的基本生活。但是年輕人剛開始也沒有什麼資金，一旦失敗了，生活會過的很艱難，還會牽連到自己的家庭。 2. 年長的人有更多的社會經驗和閱歷，當他們挑戰新的事物的時候，有更多的經驗可以參考。即使沒有相同的事件，但是也會根據自己的經歷去合理的推理。但是年輕人通常想問題比較片面和單一，做事情也比較衝動，因此失敗的概率會更大。 Disagree 單邊 1.年輕人接受的知識更加新，能夠順應時代的潮流。但是老年人思維呆板，想問題的角度比較呆板，不容易成功。 2.年輕時才有精力去take risk和explore。年輕人精力好，越是新的東西，越需要投入更多的'精力，年輕人可以熬夜也可以更多的加班加點，投入更多的時間。但是年長的相對來說體力已經跟不上，而且年長的更加顧及家裡的孩子，也希望更加穩定的生活，不願意冒風險。 3.年輕的時候多冒險和探索，體驗不同的可能性，也會使得生活更精彩。很多事情即使失敗了，但是都是給我們人生留下了很多很美好的回憶。 |
