新託福綜合寫作會給你兩篇相關的材料，一片閱讀，一篇聽力。然後根據材料寫作文。下面是小編整理的託福綜合寫作作文，大家可以參考參考。
老師給學生打的分數越來越高
1.分數打得低會減低學生的學習意志
2.會影響教師自己的測評結果
3.因為別的老師給的成績高，如果不跟著給高分，學生出去找工作會吃虧
lecture
解決方案
1.應從小灌輸正確的學習觀念，不應因一次小失利而喪失信心
2.教師的評測可以改在學期結束前進行，這樣學生的.成績就不會影響到評測結果
3.企業在選拔人才時可以看學生在班級中的排名而不是單純的成績
例文：The speaker challenges the reasoning that supports the current inflation in college grading system, and provides very specific alternatives to teacher evaluation timing and employer methodology in judging a student.
The speaker first argues that the inflated grades will not enable students to truly know their weakness, not to mention improve upon them. According to the reading, low grades will discourage students. The speaker rebuts this point and argues that the true meaning of education is not just to satisfy students. Letting the students make progress is the purpose and inflated grades will not help students in this way.
As for the reading's concerns that low grades will adversely affect teachers' evaluation, the speaker offers a solution. By finishing the teachers' evaluation before the end of the semester, we can sever the connections between the students' grades and teachers' evaluations.
Lastly, the speaker argues that the school does not have to follow the trend of inflated grades invariably. The reading argues that if the school does not follow the trend, their students will be discriminated, the lecture says that this problem can be solved by providing a weighted relative score. This score will pinpoint a student's percentile in the whole student body and show the other students' scores, thus allowing employers to clearly position the student among the entire student body.
新託福綜合寫作範文：網路問卷(web based survey)網路問卷相對傳統問卷的優勢
1.調查範圍更廣，所以調查結果就更為準確(邏輯錯誤：參加人多並不代表範圍廣，也不能保證效果好)
2.發放，填寫和收集問卷更加方便簡單
3.成本低
lecture
反駁網路問卷的優勢
1.所取得的調查結果不全面(biased)，因為不是所有人都會上網，中老年人上網會比較少，而年輕人上網比較多
2.成本並不會低，因為一個好的網路問卷需要一個團隊的大量工作(提出新的證據：網路問卷也需要成本和人力資源)
3.大多數人對網路問卷都不嚴肅，會得到不正確的資訊，容易混淆視聽。
例文： The speaker questions the effectiveness of web based surveys by providing evidences contradictory to the reading.
First, he identified the reading's logical flaw in assuming that an increase in the scope and quantity of the survey will automatically translate to greater precision of the surveys. However, if surveys aim to question people over 60 years old, how can these old people conduct surveys online since this group seldom surf the Internet? The web surveys are effective in reaching mainly the young generation. Thus the results cannot be extended to demonstrate the views of the whole population.
Second, although the web-based surveys will lower paper cost, they will inevitably incur new costs in web designing, flashy features, and other elements, which will require more costly team work. This evidence effectively attacks the reading's argument that web surveys will certainly reduce the cost of the survey.
In the end, many web designers tend to overdo in the webpage and add fancy and flashy features. As a result, many people perceive the web-based surveys as not serious and are thus not willing to respond to the surveys. Unlike physical surveys that draw attention effectively, many web based surveys are simply ignored or even deleted.
