時間，就像海綿裡的水，只要願擠，總是有的。以下是小編為大家搜尋整理的2017年公共英語pets三級閱讀理解試題及答案，希望能給大家帶來幫助!更多精彩內容請及時關注我們應屆畢業生考試網!
Directions:
Read the texts from a magazine article in which five people talked about the future of reading.
For questions 61-65, match the name of each person (61-65) to one of the statements (A-G)given below. Mark your answers on your ANSWER SHEET.
Paul:
I think books will be more affordable. They are pretty expensive. Publishers are so silly be-cause they focus on "We're not going to be selling so many hardcover books at $26. " But you're going to sell infinitely more electronically, so what are you complaining about? I view it as a grea-ter opportunity. My e-reader is great because I travel, and I don't want to carry a billion things with me.
David:
I don't own an e-reader, and I've never read a page on an e-reader. I do everything I can to avoid more screen time. Not to play down the value of a physical book, when it comes to somebody investing in one, it's something you want to keep. You have to give readers a choice, between a ric- her experience with physical books, and a more lifeless experience through an electronic reader.
James:
The new immigrants don't shoot the old inhabitants when they come in. One technology tends to supplement rather than substitute. How you read is not as important as: Will you read? Will you read something that's a book-the sustained train of thought of one person speaking to another?
Search techniques are embedded in e-books that invite people to dip into something rather than follow a full train of thought.
Alex:
We've maintained in the last few years there will be fewer bookstores. We have the best busi-ness model in the world. Books are still a majority of what we sell in stores, but they are becoming less and less. About 50 percent of physical books are sold in non-bookstore outlets, like drugstores and club stores. There are people with agendas in this industry, but the physical book is going no- where.
William:
E-readers take out the paper middleman and give me what I want from books: the words. My e-reader has allowed me to read more than ever. When I travel I can take five books with me all without cutting down a single tree or using any extra jet fuel. Books made of paper can be beautiful, but they are never as beautiful as the words in the best of them.
Now match the name of each person (61 to 65) to the appropriate statement.
Note: there are two extra statements.
Statements
61. Paul
62. David
63. James
64. Alex
65. William
A. I prefer physical books to e-books.
B. E-books are environmentally friendly.
C. The market for physical books is shrinking.
D. What counts is not how but how well you read.
E. E-reading will benefit, rather than harm, publishers.
F. The price of hardcover books will be greatly lowered.
F. Non-bookstore outlets add to the growth of physical books.
參考答案參考譯文
下面這段文字是關於5個人對於未來閱讀方式的不同觀點。
保羅：
我認為書的價格太貴了，應該更便宜。出版商愚蠢地將重點放在“我們不會以26美元的價格出售精裝書”，但是他們出售更多的電子書，所以有什麼好抱怨的呢?我認為這是一個很好的機會。我的電子閱覽器很棒，因為我旅遊時不想帶很多東西。
大衛：
我沒有電子閱覽器，也從沒在電子閱覽器上看過書，我儘量避免使用電子螢幕。不是要貶低紙質書的價值，當一個人購買一本紙質書的時候，他是想要收藏。閱讀一本豐富多彩的紙質書還是閱讀毫無生氣的電子書，應該要讓讀者自己選擇。
詹姆士：
就像新來的移民者不會射殺當地居民一樣，新科技的發明是一種補充而不是替代。你讀書的方式遠沒有以下幾點重要：你會讀書嗎?你讀的書是作者思想對讀者進行的'一種傾訴嗎?電子書所具備的搜尋技術能使人們更深入地去閱讀而不是盲目跟隨某一種思想。
艾利克斯：
在過去幾年裡，我們一直認為書店會越來越少。我們有世界上最好的銷售模式。書籍仍是商店出售的主要產品，但是他們的銷量越來越少。大約50%的紙質書都是在非書店(如藥店、俱樂部)的打折活動中賣出的。這個產業中人們有自己的El程安排，但是紙質書卻無路可走了。
威廉：
電子閱覽器沒有了中間商，給我的是我想從書裡看到的文字。我的電子閱讀器能讓我讀到更多的內容。當我旅行的時候我可以帶5本書，不會多砍一棵樹也不會增加飛機燃油消耗。紙質書是很美麗，但是不會比書裡面的文字更美麗。
61.E【精析】主旨題。保羅認為出版商出售電子書是一個很好的機會，會給他們帶來利潤，與E項“電子閱讀會給出版商帶來更多的好處而不是壞處”相符，故選E。
62.A【精析】主旨題。大衛認為人們應該自己選擇想要看書的方式，他更傾向於紙質書，與A項表示相同的意思，故選A。
63.D【精析】主旨題。詹姆士認為電子書的作用是補充讀書方式，而不是替代紙質書，重要的不是如何讀書，而是讀得怎麼樣，與D項“重要的不是如何讀書，而是讀得怎麼樣”意思相符，故選D。
64.C【精析】主旨題。艾利克斯認為紙質書雖然是商店出售的主要產品，但是銷量在逐年下降，這與C項的“紙質書的市場在萎縮”意思相同，故選C。
65.B【精析】主旨題。威廉認為電子書不會消耗資源並且不會增加飛機燃油消耗，這與8項“電子書非常環保”意思相同，故選B。
