GMAT作文在寫作過程中會碰到哪些錯誤呢?下面小編就對GMAT作文容易發生的幾種錯誤進行歸納總結，以供正在備考GMAT作文的同學進行參考，歡迎您的檢視!
錯誤一：無因果聯絡
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
錯誤二：樣本不足 Insufficient-sample
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
錯誤三: 錯誤類比 (based on a false analogy )<橫向>
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....
錯誤四：時地全等 all things are equal<縱向>
The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
錯誤五： 二者擇一 Either-Or choice
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
錯誤六： 可疑調查 survey is doubtful
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion d be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
錯誤七： 結論無據 gratuitous assumption
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
延伸閱讀：GMAT寫作評分標準大全
一、六分(outstanding)：對事件的複雜性的分析清楚有力;熟練駕馭有效寫作的要素。
1.在就某事件展開分析和闡述自己觀點時擺出有洞察力的原因和/或有說服力的事例。
2.結構清晰。
3.對於語言(包括用詞和句法多樣性)有很好的掌握。
4.文章完全符合標準書面英語規範(包括語法、用法和拼寫規則)，但可能會有小錯誤。
二、五分(strong)：對事件的複雜性有充分的分析;很好地掌握了有效寫作的要素。
1.闡述觀點時能運用恰當有力的理由/或事例。
2.結構較清晰。
3.對於語言(包括用詞和句法多樣性)有良好的掌握。
4.較好的掌握標準書面英語規範(包括語法、用法和拼寫規則)，但可能會有小錯誤。
三、四分(adequate)：對事件的複雜性有一定的分析;對寫作的要素有一定的掌握。
1.闡述觀點時能舉出與事件相關的理由/或事例。
2.結構基本合理。
3.對於語言(包括用詞和句法)有一定的'掌握，但句法缺乏多樣性。
4.對於標準書面英語的規範有一定掌握，但有一些錯誤。
四、三分(limited)：對事件的複雜性有一定的分析;對寫作的要素有一定的掌握，但有明顯缺陷，一般具備下列特徵中的一項或幾項：
1.觀點模糊或不充分。
2.結構鬆散。
3.不善於舉出與議題相關的理由或事例。
4.語言不準確且/或句子缺乏多樣性。
5.在語法、用法或拼寫上偶有錯誤或常有小錯誤。
五、二分(seriously flawed)：在分析性寫作技巧上表現出嚴重缺陷，一般具備下列特徵中的一項或幾項：
1.觀點不明確或未能充分展開。
2.毫無結構可言。
3.缺乏相關的理由或事例。
4.在語言運用或句子結構上經常出現嚴重錯誤。
5.在語法、用法或拼寫上錯誤很多，影響文章表達。
六、一分(fundamentally deficient)：在分析性寫作技巧上有根本缺陷，一般具備下列特徵中的一項或幾項：
1.無法完整地敘述問題。
2.在語言和句子結構上不斷有嚴重錯誤。
3.在語法、用法或拼寫上有大量錯誤，嚴重影響文章表達。
七、零分
跑題、非英語寫作、重抄原題等。
八、NR
白卷。
