2017年考研即將垃圾序幕，下面是小編為大家提供的2016年的考研英語的閱讀理解真題(1)及答案詳解應該會給大家帶來很大的助力。
Section Ⅱ Reading Comprehension
Part A
Directions：Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)
Text1
France，which prides itself as the global innovator of fashion, has decided its fashion industry has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty for women. Its lawmakers gave preliminary approval last week to a law that would make it a crime to employ ultra-thin models on runways. The parliament also agreed to ban websites that “incite excessive thinness” by promoting extreme dieting.
Such measures have a couple of uplifting motives. They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up impinging on health. That’s a start. And the ban on ultra-thin models seems to go beyond protecting models from starving themselves to death –as some have done. It tells the fashion industry that it must take responsibility for the signal it sends women, especially teenage girls, about the social tape-measure they must use to determine their individual worth.
The bans, if fully enforced, would suggest to women (and many men) that they should not let others be arbiters of their beauty. And perhaps faintly, they hint that people should look to intangible qualities like character and intellect rather than dieting their way to size zero or wasp-waist physiques.
The French measures, however, rely too much on severe punishment to change a culture that still regards beauty as skin-deep-and bone-showing. Under the law, using a fashion model that does not meet a government-defined index of body mass could result in a $85,000 fine and six months in prison.
The fashion industry knows it has an inherent problem in focusing on material adornment and idealized body types. In Denmark, the United States, and a few other countries, it is trying to set voluntary standards for models and fashion images that rely more on peer pressure for enforcement.
In contrast to France’s actions, Denmark’s fashion industry agreed last month on rules and sanctions regarding the age, health, and other characteristics of models. The newly revised Danish Fashion Ethical Charter clearly states:”We are aware of and take responsibility for the impact the fashion industry has on body ideals, especially on young people”. The charter’s main tool of enforcement is to deny access for designers and modeling agencies to Copenhagen Fashion Week (CFW), which is run by the Danish Fashion Institute. But in general it relies on a name-and -shame method of compliance.
Relying on ethical persuasion rather than law to address the misuse of body ideals may be the best step. Even better would be to help elevate notions of beauty beyond the material standards of a particular industry.
21. According to the first paragraph，what would happen in France?
[A]Physical beauty would be redefined.
[B]New runways would be constructed.
[C]Websites about dieting would thrive.
[D]The fashion industry would decline.
22. The phrase “impinging on”(Line 2，Para.2) is closest in meaning to
[A]heightening the value of
[B]indicating the state of
[C]losing faith in
[D]doing harm to
23. Which of the following is true of the fashion industry?
[A]The French measures have already failed.
[B]New standards are being set in Denmark.
[C]Models are no longer under peer pressure.
[D]Its inherent problems are getting worse.
24.A designer is most likely to be rejected by CFW for
[A]pursuing perfect physical conditions
[B]caring too much about model’s character.
[C]showing little concern for health factors
[D]setting a high age threshold for models.
h of the following may be the best title of the text?
[A]A Challenge to the Fashion Industry’s Body Ideals
[B]A Dilemma for the Starving models in France
[C]Just Another Round of Struggle for Beauty
[D]The Great Threats to the Fashion Industry
21.答案 A Physical beauty would be redefined
解析：這是一道細節題，根據France定位到第一段第一句，主幹成分為France has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty。此外第二段第二句They suggest beauty should not be define by looks…故而A physical beauty would be redefined為同義替換，即為正確答案。
22.答案 D doing harm to
解析：此題為詞義題。定位到第二段第二句They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up impinging on health. 根據end up 可以看出beauty should not be defined by looks 和that end up impinging on health為順承關係，所以“改變人們對美不僅僅是外表的定義”可以結束對健康的危害。故而可以推知doing harm to是正確答案。
23.答案 B New Standards are being set in Denmark
解析：此題是正誤判斷題。根據第五段第二句話 In Denmark,…it is trying to set voluntary standards for models and fashion…可知B選項 New standards are being set in Denmark是其同義替換。
24.答案 C showing little concern for health factors
解析：細節題。一個設計師很可能因為什麼原因被CFW拒絕，根據關鍵詞可回到文中定位至倒數第二段，首句說丹麥的時尚界就有關模特的年齡，健康及其他特性的內容達成一致意見，切一項新法案也明確規定，他們已經意識到時尚界對於人們尤其是年輕人的身體健康所帶來的影響，並且該對此負責，接著下一句就說，這一法規的執行方式就是拒絕一些設計師，因為可以推斷設計師很可能因為不考慮身體健康因素而被CFW拒絕。
25.答案 D A challenge to the Fashion Industry’s Body Ideals
解析：主旨題。本文從首段就開始闡述法國的觀點，即時尚界已經失去了定義女性身體之美的權利，且議會也禁止網站通過宣傳過度節食來強調過度消瘦。二段繼續說明美麗不能只看外表更不能以犧牲健康為代價。三段說女性不該讓他人來評判自己的美麗。以及後面的段落中也一直在不斷說明一點，即健康很重要，不能只看外表。所以文章最佳標題應該是D，對時尚界完美身材的質疑。
Text 2
For the first time in history more people live in towns than in the country. In Britain this has had a curious result. While polls show Britons rate”the countryside”alongside the royal family, Shakespeare and the National Health Serivce (NHS) as what makes them proudest of their country, this has limited political support.
A century ago Octavia Hill Launched the National Trust not to rescue stylish houses but to save“the beauty of natural places for everyone forever” was specifically to provide city dwellers with spaces for leisure where they could experience“a refreshing air .”Hill’s pressure later led to creation of national parks and green belts. They don’t make countryside any more，and every year concrete consumes more of it . It needs constant guardianship.
At the next election none of the big parties seem likely to endorse this sentiment. The conservatives’planning reform explicitly gives rural development priority over conservation， even authorising“off-plan”building where local people might object. The concept of sustainable development has been defined as profitable. Labour likewise wants to discontinue local planning where councils oppose development. The Liberal Democrats are silent. Only Ukip, sensing its chance,has sided with those pleading for a more considered approach to using green land. Its Campaign to Protect Rural England struck terror into many local conservative parties.
The sensible place to build new houses，factories and offices is where people are，in cities and towns where infrastructure is in place. The London agents Stirling Ackroyd recently identified enough sites for half a million houses in the London area alone，with no intrusion on green belt. What is true of London is even truer of the provinces.
The idea that”housing crisis”equals“concreted meadows” is pure lobby talk. The issue is not the need for more houses but, as always，where to put them. Under lobby pressure，George Osborne favours rural new-build against urban renovation and renewal. He favours out-of-town shopping sites against high streets . This is not a free market but a biased one. Rural towns and villages have grown and will always grow. They do so best where building sticks to their edges and respects their character. We do not ruin urban Development should be planned, not let rip. After the Netherlands, Britain is Europe’s most crowed country. Half a century of town and country planning has enabled it to retain an enviable rural coherence, while still permitting low-density urban living. There is no doubt of the alternative --- the corrupted landscapes of southern Portugal, Spain or Ireland. Avoiding this rather than promoting it should unite the left and right of the political spectrum.
ain’s public sentiment about the countryside
[A]has brought much benefit to the NHS.
[B]didn’t start till the Shakespearean age.
[C]is fully backed by the royal family.
[D]is not well reflected in politics.
27. According to Paragraph 2，the achievements of the National Trust are now being
[A]gradually destroyed.
[B]effectively reinforced.
[C]properly protected.
[D]largely overshadowed.
h of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 3?
[A]Ukip may gain from its support for rural conservation.
[B]the Conservatives may abandon ”off -plan“ building.
[C]the Liberal Democrats are losing political influence.
[D]labour is under attack for opposing development.
author holds that George Osborne’s preference
[A]reveals a strong prejudice against urban areas.
[B]shows his disregard for the character of rural areas.
[C]stresses the necessity of easing the housing crisis.
[D]highlights his firm stand against lobby pressure.
the last paragraph，the author shows his appreciation of
[A]the size of population in Britain.
[Bthe enviable urban lifestyle in Britain.
[C]the town-and-country planning in Britain.
[D]the political life in today is Britain.
26.答案 D is not well reflected in politics
解析：細節題。精讀題幹，劃出關鍵詞。根據題幹回到原文精確定位到首段最後一句，該句中的polls民意調查對應題幹中的public sentiment，定位答案處為“this has limited political support”，意思為這在政治支援方面是有限的。與D選項“在政治上沒有得到很好的反響”為同義替換。
27.答案 D largely overshadowed
解析：細節題。根據題幹，題幹中出現大寫the National Trust，定位到第二段首句the National Trust該句。二段首句只是對Hill的該專案做介紹，需向後看影響。往下可以讀到Hill’s pressure這句，寫到“Hill的專案創造出國家公園和綠地。他們不再製造鄉村了，而且每年鋼筋混凝土消耗的鄉村越來越多。鄉村需要持久的保護”。對應選項，該專案的成就很大程度上被奪取了光輝。
28.答案 A Ukip may gain from its support for rural conservation
解析：推斷題。題幹問的是從第三段能推出什麼，考察的是相應段落的段落中心。觀察選項不難發現，選項中都是大寫的Ukip，The Conservatives，The Liberal Democrats，Labour。可根據選項中的大寫回段落中尋找，發現Ukip所在的定位句為Only的倒裝強調句(倒裝強調句往往為答案所在處)。該句子意思是：只有Ukip意識到其機會，並支援這些人。和選項A對應一下，Ukip可能能從其對農村保護的支援中獲得好處，是同義替換。
29.答案B Shows his disregard for the character of rural areas
解析：細節題 問的是作者對於奧斯本的偏好(觀點)的具體看法。根據關鍵詞奧斯本定位至第五段，因為問的是作者對於奧斯本觀點的看法，所以只需要看在奧斯本的觀點之後作者的表達內容，第五段倒數兩句話就是作者表達自己觀點的地方，即“我們沒有破壞城市中受到保護的地方”，“你們為什麼要破壞鄉村的呢?”這就說明奧斯本一方的觀點是要破壞鄉村環境。所以可得出答案是奧斯本想法表明了他對於鄉村人們的忽視。
30.答案C the-town-and-country planning in Britain
解析：根據題幹定位到最後一段，問的是作者欣賞讚同什麼，作者的觀點即是文章末段的段落中心，可定位到末段末句。末句指出，避免this會將左右黨派聯絡起來，this代詞指代指代上句中所提到的內容。Should即作者贊同的地方，也就是作者贊同的是城鄉結合。
TEXT3
“There is on and only one social responsibility of business,” wrote Milton Friedman, a Nobel prize-winning economist, “That is, to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits.” But even if you accept Friedman’s premise and regard corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies as a waste of shareholders’ money, things may not be absolutely clear-cut. New research suggests that CSR may create monetary value for companies-at least when they are prosecuted for corruption.
The largest firms in America and Britain together spend more than $15 billion a year on CSR, according to an estimate by EPG, a consulting firm. This could add value to their businesses in three ways. First, consumers may take CSR spending as a “signal” that a company’s products are of high quality. Second, customers may be willing to buy a company’s products as an indirect way to donate to the good causes it helps. And third, through a more diffuse “halo effect,” whereby its good deeds earn it greater consideration from consumers and others.
Previous studies on CSR have had trouble differentiating these effects because consumers can be affected by all three. Al recent study attempts to separate them by looking at bribery prosecutions under America’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). It argues that since prosecutors do not consume a company’s products as part of their investigations, they could be influenced only by the halo effect.
The study found that, among prosecuted firms, those with the most comprehensive CSR programmes tended to get more lenient penalties,. Their analysis ruled out the possibility that it was firm’s political influence, rather than their CSR stand, that accounted for the leniency: Companies that contributed more to political campaigns did not receive lower fines.
In all, the study concludes that whereas prosecutors should only evaluate a case based on its merits, they do seem to be influenced by a company’s record in CSR. “We estimate that either eliminating a substantial labour-rights concern , such as child labour, or increasing corporate giving byabout20% results in fines that generally are 40% lower than the typical punishment for bribing foreign officials”, says one researcher.
Researchers admit that their study does not answer the question of how much businesses ought to spend on CSR. Nor does it reveal how much companies are banking on the halo effect, rather than the other possible benefits, when they decide their do-gooding policies. But at least they have demonstrated that when companies get into trouble with the law, evidence of good character can win them less costly punishment.
author views Milton Friedman’s statement about CSR with
[A]tolerance.
[B]skepticism.
[C]uncertainty.
[D]approval.
rding to Paragraph 2,CSR helps a company by
[A]winning trust from consumers.
[B]guarding it against malpractices.
[C]protecting it from being defamed.
[D]raising the quality of its products.
33. The expression “more lenient ”(line 2,para.4)is closest in meaning to
[A]more effective
[B]less controversial
[C]less severe
[D]more lasting
34. When prosecutors evaluate a case, a company’s CSR regard
[A]has an impact on their decision
[B]comes across as reliable evidence
[C]increases the chance of being penalized
[D]constitutes part of the investigation
h of the following is true of CSR, according to the last paragraph?
[A] Its negative effects on businesses are often overlooked.
[B] The necessary amount of companies’ spending on it is unknown.
[C] Companies’ financial capacity for it has been overestimated.
[D] It has brought much benefit to the banking industry.
31.答案 B Skepticism
解析：作者觀點態度題。題幹問的是作者對有關CSR方面Milton Friedman的說法是什麼態度。根據大寫Milton Friedman這個人定位到定位到首段首句。注意題幹問的是作者的看法，因此定位到後一句but轉折處。轉折處的主題句式“things may not absolutely clear-cut”，作者持的是否定態度，選擇答案B。C選項是作者態度不明確，不能選擇。
32.答案 A winning trust from consumers
解析：根據題幹找到第二段.根據第二段內容,CSR could add value to their business in three ways. 從而定位下面三點。First後面出現了high quality，但是它是在從句中，從句修飾"signal",而本句謂語動詞是take，與D中 raising 並不是同義詞，故排除。Second,和third 都與消費者購買心態有關，和A選項 winning trust from consumers 相對應。而B，C選項的malpractices和defamed在原文中並未出現，且沒有同義詞，故排除。
33.答案 C less severe
解析：根據題幹找到第四段對應處。可見題乾的 more lenient 是作為修飾 penalties(懲罰) 的，故推測本句在討論 CSR 和 penalties 有什麼聯絡。而本段與懲罰相關的詞只有最後一個詞 fines(罰金)，修飾它的形容詞是lower, 故可推測 more lenient 與降低懲罰有關，只有C選項滿足。
34.答案A has an impact on their decision
解析：題幹中問的是 CSR record 與 prosecutors evaluate a case 的關係，根據題幹內容到對應點：第五段第一句。本句說， do seem to be influenced by a company's recore in CSR.這裡的 be influenced 與A選項 has an impact 對應，故選A. 而B選項中的 reliable evidence, C 選項中的 the chance of being penalized 在原文中沒有體現。D選項中的 investigation 與題幹中的 When prosecutors evaluate a case 明顯對應不上，故不予考慮。
35.答案B The necessary amount of companies’ spending on it is unknown
解析：該題是一道判斷題，題幹問的是有關CSR哪個是對的'。先根據CSR回到最後一段，定位到末段首句。首句提到“研究人員承認到其研究沒有回答如下問題：公司應該在CSR方面花費多少錢”。選項B的意思是公司在其方面的花費是未知的，屬於原文的同義替換。
Text4
There will eventually come a day when The New York Times ceases to publish stories on newsprint. Exactly when that day will be is a matter of debate. “Sometime in the future”, the paper’s publisher said back in 2010.
Nostalgia for ink on paper and the rustle of pages aside, there’s plenty of incentive to ditch print. The infrastructure required to make a physical newspaper — printing presses, delivery trucks — isn’t just expensive; it’s excessive at a time when online-only competitors don’t have the same set of financial constraints. Readers are migrating away from print away. And though print ad sales still dwarf their online and mobile counterparts, revenue from print is still declining.
Overhead may be high and circulation lower, but rushing to eliminate its print edition would be a mistake, says BuzzFeed CEO Joah Peretti.
Peretti says the Times shouldn’t waste time getting out of the print business, but only if they go about doing it the right way.” Fighting out a way to accelerate that transition would make sense of them,” he said, “but if you discontinue it, you’re going to have your most loyal customers really upset with you.”
Sometimes that’s worth making a change anyway. Peretti gives the example seen as a blunder,” he said. The move turned out to be foresighted. And if Peretti would raise pricesand make it into more of a legacy product.”
The most loyal customers would still get the product they favor, the idea goes, and they’d feel like they were helping sustain the quality of something they believe in. “So if you’re overpaying for print, you could feel like you were helping,”Peretti said. “Then increase it at a higher rate each year and essentially try to generate additional revenue.”In other words, if you’re going to make a print product ,make it for the people who are already obsessed with it. Which way be what the Times is doing already. Getting the print edition seven days a week costs $500 a year — more than twice as much as a digital-only subscription.
“It’s a really hard thing to do and it’s a tremendous luxury that BuzzFeed doesn’t have a legacy business,”Peretti remarked. “But we’re going to have questions like that where we have things we’re doing that don’t make sense when the market changes and the world changes. In those situations, it’s better to be more aggressive than less aggressive. ”
New York Times is considering ending its print edition partly due to
[A]the pressure from its investors.
[B]the complaints from its readers.
[C]the high cost of operation.
[D]the increasing online ad sales.
37. Peretti suggests that, in face of the present situation, the Times should
[A]make strategic adjustments
[B]end the print edition for good.
[C]seek new sources of readership.
[D]aim for efficient management.
38. It can be inferred form Paragraphs 5 and 6 that a “legacy product”
[A]will have the cost of printing reduced.
[B]is meant for the most loyal customers.
[C]helps restore the glory of former times.
[D]expands the popularity of the paper.
39. Peretti believes that, in a changing world,
[A]traditional luxuries can stay unaffected.
[B]aggressiveness better meets challenges.
[C]cautiousness facilitates problem-solving.
[D]legacy businesses are becoming outdated.
40. Which of the following would be the best title of the text?
[A]Make Your Print Newspaper a Luxury Good.
[B]Keep Your Newspapers Forever in Fashion.
[C]Cherish the Newspaper Still in Your Hand.
[D]Shift to Online Newspapers All at Once.
36.答案 C the high cost of operation
解析：因果細節題，問的是紐約時報考慮停止紙質版新聞印刷出版的原因是什麼。文章首段首句即是此內容的同義表達，二段解釋具體原因，二段二句內容 The infrastructure isn't just expensive; it's excessive at a time when online-only competitors don't have the same set of financial constraints.意思是維持紙質印刷的基礎設施建設不僅僅是貴，是相當貴， 而他們的競爭對手卻沒有這樣的經濟上的限制。
37.答案 A make strategic adjustments
解析：細節題，問的是面對目前的形勢，Peretti建議時代雜誌怎麼做，根據關鍵詞Peretti迴文定位至第四段，首句內容是Peretti說時代雜誌不該浪費時間去想著如何停止紙質印刷，而應該找到一種正確的方法去解決這件事。接著二句往後在具體說明該如何正確解決目前的問題。由此推出答案是A 做出策略上的調整。
38.答案 B is meant for the most loyal customers
解析：推斷題與詞彙題的結合，要根據上下文來做出選擇。首先定位在第五段最後一句：I would raise prices and make it into more of a legacy product. 不僅要提高價格還要將它變為一種可以傳承的產物。單單這一句不足以做出選擇。需要繼續往下看在第六段中有沒有對於這個詞的解釋之類的。第六段開頭提到了他認為most consumer 依舊堅持去相信他們認為好的東西，喜歡的，相信的東西。如果可以每年增加一些比例，那麼依舊是可以創收的。長篇大段的敘述可以讓大家明白這個詞一定跟consumer有關。最為關鍵的是：緊接著出現了 inother world， 重述上文，不過卻簡潔的總結了前文。如果我們要做這些print product， 那就選擇那些已經痴迷於他們的人吧。(那麼對於他們來講就是一件可以傳承的東西了，以前喜歡，會依舊喜歡下去)。所以這句為做題的關鍵，對應同義替換，選擇B。
A選項中的降低成本沒有在文中相應位置涉及到。 C重建以往的關榮，與消費者關係不大 D擴大受歡迎程度，範圍過大。
39.答案B aggressiveness better meets challenges
解析：觀點態度題。偏細節題。定位Peretti在文中的觀點，首次出現在第三段 overhead…but rushing to eliminate its print edition would be a mistake.並且一直貫穿於下文。我們首先從選項來看。A 中…can stay unaffected 過於絕對，不選。D 選項中legacy business 不是文中的討論話題，所以可以直接排除。而C選項中謹慎可以促進問題的解決，在perreti的觀點中根本沒有體現，相反他建議要有所改變，並且要找對方式，言下之意就是大膽去面對挑戰。所以最終確定是B。
40.答案A Make Your Print Newspaper a Luxury Good
解析：主旨題。出現在最後一道題目中，全文共有7段，根據上面的細節題目，大致可以確定本文的中心詞為“print newspaper”B，C 兩個選項中的newspaper 都屬於範圍過大，是主旨題的典型錯誤選項，而D選項中出現的online newspaper 只是文中print newspaper時提到的一個面臨的 一個挑戰，不足以引領全文，並且all at once, 是“立刻，馬上”之意，與原文的觀點也有出入，最終確定選A。
Part B
Directions:
In the following article, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the list A-G to fit into each of the numbered blank. There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the gaps. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
[A]Create a new image of yourself
[B]Decide if the time is right
[C]Have confidence in yourself
[D]Understand the context
[E]Work with professionals
[F]Know your goals
[G]Make it efficient
No matter how formal or informa the work environment，the way you present yourself has an impact. This is especially true in first impressions. According to research from Princeton University，people assess your competence，trustworthiness，and likeability in just a tenth of a second，solely based on the way you look.
The difference between today’s workplace and the“dress for success” era is that the range of options is so much broader. Norms have evolved and fragmented. In some settings, red sneakers or dress T-shirts can convey status; in others not so much. Plus, whatever image we present is magnified by social-media services like LinkedIn. Chances are, your headshots are seen much more often now than a decade or two ago. Millennials, it seems, face the paradox of being the least formal generation yet the most conscious of style and personal branding. It can be confusing.
So how do we navigate this? How do we know when to invest in an upgrade? And what’s the best way to pull off one that enhance our goals? Here are some tips;
41.___________________________________________
As an executive coach, I’ve seen image upgrades be particularly helpful during transitions---when looking for a new job, stepping into a new or more public role, or changing work environments. If you’re in a period of change or just feeling stuck and in a rut, now may be a good time. If you’re not sure, ask for honest feedback from trusted friends, colleagues and professionals. Look for cues about how others perceive e there’s no need for an upgrade and that’s OK.
42.___________________________________________
Get clear on what impact you’re hoping to have. Are you looking to refresh your image or pivot it? For one person, the goal may be to be taken more seriously and enhance their professional image. For another, it may be to be perceived as more approachable, or more modern and stylish. For someone moving from finance to advertising, maybe they want to look more“SoHo”.(It’s OK to use characterizations like that.)
43.___________________________________________
Look at your work environment like an anthropologist. What are the norms of your environment? What converys status? Who are your most important audiences? How do the people you respect and look up to present themselves? The better you understand the cultural context, the more control you can have over your impact.
44.___________________________________________
Enlist the support of professionals and share with them your goals and context. Hire a personal stylist, or use the free styling service of a store like . Try a hair stylist instead of a barber. Work with a professional photographer instead of your spouse or friend. It’s not as expensive as you might think.
45.___________________________________________
The point of a style upgrade isn’t to become more vain or to spend more time passing over what to wear. Instead, use it as an opportunity to reduce decision fatigue. Pick a standard work uniform or a few go-to options. Buy all your clothesonce with a stylist instead of shopping alone, one article of clothing at a time.
41.B Decide if the time is right
解析：此段第一句話主句裡面說“在過渡的階段提升自我形象尤其有用”。第二句和第三、四句分別展開說明，第二句表明：如果你處在變動的時期或者感覺需要變動，那麼可能這可能是一個好的時機。 相反，第三、四句話表示：如果不確定的話，就需要得到別人的反饋了。也許無需提升。故整段的意思是說要先確定是否現在是提升自我形象的正確時機。故答案為C選項。
42.F Know your goals
解析：此段中心句即第一句話，標明“要清楚你想要的結果或影響”。其實就是你想要的目標。緊接著開始解釋，提到比如，你是否想要更新你的形象?那麼，對於一個人來講，這個目標可能是要被認真對待或者要加強專業的形象。對於其他人，這個目標可能是要被看作可以觸控到的，或者是現代的，或者是時尚的。對於那些要從金融轉到廣告的，他們可能得看起來更“SOHO”.所以，整段都在講目標。而選項F中的”goal”形成復現。故為答案。
43.D Understand the context
解析：復現原則，文章多次重複environment, understand the context 就是要理解你的工作處境。
44.E Work with professionals
解析：復現原則，文章多次重複professional, work with,就是要與專業人士一起工作。
45.G Make it efficient
解析：此段第二句句首出現instead, 故為轉折句。所以從此句獲得中心內容。該句講的是“最好是將形象升級用做減少做決定的機會。”緊接著提到“選取一套標準的工作服或幾個其他的選擇。把衣服一下子都買了，而不是一個人購買，或者一次只買一件”。這些提到的都是要有效率。故選G。
