下面是小編整理的幾個實用的GMAT作文模板使用方法及範文，提供給大家參考。
【學生的作業】
Para2：
Undoubtedly, gov should take responsibility to subside art within limitation, because this can both promote the development of art of proper value and manipulate some side effect in the art’s boom, such as illegal speculation, at the same time.
Q：第一句如果是“先承認前提就不要‘within limitation’”，此時怎麼處理?
Furthermore, this support will call up public right attitude to the art
On the other hand, if gov provide whatever as the art industry wants, this will evoke the greed of this industry, thus breaking the social order. In other words(不可以放到下一段)，……
Besides, unlimited financial aid, such as appropriate and spiritual help, such as …, will weaken the investment on other public construction, such as office building, health care, etc.
Q：是否這段太細所以把“on the other hand”的話說完了呢?
III.結尾：
1.展望未來：如果把握不好度容易無病呻吟，所以建議用第二種
2. “欲擒故縱”：
邏輯原理是：雖然我不同意這觀點，但我承認在某些方面還是對的，列出什麼好處。但是，就我看來，壞處overweight好處。[LC3]
As given above, I disagree that gov should provide limited support to art. But(不要!) admittedly, it can also makes a different that gov meet whatever desire of the art industry in a short term: rescuing them from a financial crisis suddenly, recovering public’s confidence to the society and the market, etc. But all these above cannot amount to a greater thing than the side effects as I presented to me.
【comments from老鷹】：
1. 思維：可以
2. 詞彙和句子：很不好，太抽象。 II.具體框架Justification：根據分觀點的關係有如下分類
一、【第一種】並列性列舉：大多數人這麼寫
如果要這麼寫的要求是：越往後的分觀點：越不能虛，要往實了寫——
因為方向一樣的情況下，選擇的分觀點多了，就可能越往後面越沒話，進而就偏虛，這樣的壞處是：可能導致前後分觀點存在包含關係，但是我開頭的 “1st，2nd”表達的含義是它們是並列的，這樣就產生了logical conflict!不好。
Eg：是否同意“出國好”?
1st ：出國學到一些國際化的知識
2nd： 出國可以積累人脈
3rd： 出國可以長見識——錯!
或：把“出國可以長見識”放在開始也不可以!因為一來就虛了，後面的“學知識”“積累社會經驗”等等都可以視為包含於它的，就錯了!
二、【第二種】 遞進式
層層展開——注意一個合理order：比如剛才那個不能說反了
Eg："Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced. "
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above?
(1)破題：
1) 同意：兩句話都同意。這兩句話的關係是第一句是第二句的前提。
2) 不同意：可以weaken第一句或第二句，任意，但是usually是weaken第二句，因為第一句elaborate起來相對難一些，但是想得出來也可以。
【看範文】：
總觀點：不同意。
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government.
——這句話：weaken了前提“clearly”那句。
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron.
——這句話：承認前提，weaken第二句。
所以，這麼看下來，整個邏輯是：
首先，政府就不應該支援。
其次，即使政府應該支援，這個支援也應該是有限制性的。
【注意】：請注意這裡的logical order——
如果兩個分觀點顛倒了順序就不可以：因為下面那個的內容已經承認“要支援藝術了”，如果放到第一個，後面再來個“不同意支援藝術”，前後矛盾!
三、【第三種】正反對比
1. 邏輯原理：排除他因
1) 正面：有/沒有了這東西為什麼好
2) 反面：如果沒有這東西，為什麼不好或好。
2. 措辭：
1)正面：沒有問題
2)反面：不可以直接說“如果沒有這東西”，這樣就與分觀點1的用詞重複了，所以此時比較preferable的方式是，列舉一個“正面取非”的現象的子集。
Eg：出國好不好?
分觀點1：出國如何好
分觀點2：在國內考研[LC2] 如何不好。
3. 結構：大 小 大 小
para1：出國的好處(後面+elaboration+justification)
para2：furthermore，出國還怎麼好(感覺與para1方向一致，進一步昇華，視為一種進一步的elaboration)
para3：國內考研的壞處(後面+elaboration+justification)
para4：Besides，國內考研還……不好
Q：是否可以在para4變為“國內工作”?
【注意】：分段的Elaboration 需要indicator：specially，furthermore——遞進conj
段內的elaboration的cator：in other words
注意區別! 三、【第三種】是第二種的一種變式
1. 疑問句或反問句(推薦後者，語氣更強。比如：Doesn’t it…?)
2 講故事
3 觀點
【注意】：
2和3都一樣，加上1，目的是：讓讀者感覺到你的調皮、淘氣與可愛，讓文章不至於那麼死板，特別是對於已經比較boring的raters，這是一種從感情上拿分的方式!
Eg：請自己通過下面這段話找出issue是什麼
Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-80, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
Issue：石油漲價是否會導致經濟衰退?
可見，這段話是方向清楚的。
Eg：學生練習——請分別用三種開頭方式寫一遍
"A powerful business leader has far more opportunity to influence the course of a community or a nation than does any government official. " Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above
(我的)：
第一種：很好
The author argues that a leader of great ability can affect the operation of a society or a country more widely and deeply. Suppose that in a society filled with this conception, the public will ignore the function and effect of government, then gov’s work will lose support and even be intervered , thus losing proper control of some bad things: free ride, speculation, etc, which cannot be malpulated by business org. Thus, I hold that it is equally important…
第二種：
J, a powerful leader of corp K——the chief client of the estate company P, had less effect on the control of P’s vicious violation of ethic rules: heavy speculation than the intervene of gov. In 1990, the boom of P, P took advantage of this prime period to induce miracle amount of foreign money to the US and at the same time it charged vitally higher price of its 3rd office building near the Los Angeles airport, thus spiring the anger of public. Facing this situation, k stopped its relationship with P to punish P, but this won’t have a mearable change on P’s action, while gov improved the tax on their every office building to be sold largely——ultimately, P has to put its price down to the average leve. Therefore, in my opion, gov has a more far-reaching impact on the operation of a community or a nation.
【存在的問題】：
1)第一句：沒有說政府的影響多的後果是什麼，就只能讓讀者讀出一個現象，但是讀不出方向。
我應該在我的文字中明確給出方向是什麼。Ie：
如果我支援“gov作用更重要”：就說“政府影響更大則有什麼好處”或“企業影響更大有什麼壞處”;
如果我支援“企業應該作用更大”：就反之。
而我目前的表述：只有“政府影響更大”，沒有“後果如何”，就是事實出來了，觀點沒有，所以不行!
【修改後】：第一句——
Gov has larger effect on the control of the bad speculation of corp J, an estate company, than J’s chief client K, an medical corp, thus preventing the flowing of work force and further decline of stock price of J.[LC1]
2)中間的elaboration太長太繞：讓人讀的煩、容易讀不懂，必須改得短且精煉一些。
第三種：
Doesn’t a powerful leader can really affect a course of a nation more widely than the government?
【說明】：
以上3種屬於高分的寫法，但不是隻侷限於這3個，有自己認為好的也可以。
在進入II之前，有一點說一下：關於“核心概念”和“概念間關係”的界定——
(1) 原理：要對一個觀點發表我的評論(同意或不同意)，前提是知道這個觀點是什麼。而界定的目的就是“搞清楚題目什麼”的過程!
(2)怎麼處理：基於1)——
1) 如果題目本身很具體了(注意：具體≠簡單，只是說概念的含義精確了不會ambiguous了)：就不需要這步，因為沒有必要，加上去是畫蛇添足，違背了“every word tells”。
比如：
A)"Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced. "
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above?
B)是否同意“當今社會在網上找工作更好”
以上兩個就是很具象化的，不需要界定。
2) 題目中存在一些抽象詞、且關係不清楚，就需要先界定：在我看來，**是什麼意思。
比如：
A)"What education fails to teach us is to see the human community as one. Rather than focus on the unique differences that separate one nation from another, education should focus on the similarities among all people and places on Earth."
【分析】：對“共性”和“個性”應該界定一下
B)"There is only one definition of success-to be able to spend your life in your own way. "
【分析】：對“成功”界定一下。
Q：怎麼界定“成功”?因為這題中已經在問“def”了啊?
