雅思成績是進入英聯邦國家高校深造的通行證。目前，所有的英聯邦國家高校都認可雅思成績，澳大利亞還把雅思作為唯一認可的英語水平測試考試。以下是yjbys網小編整理的關於雅思寫作要上7開頭段是關鍵，供大家備考。
經歷了所謂的“模版時代”再到“擺脫模板時代”，雅思寫作無論是判分標準還是難度上與過去相比的確有很大的變化，當然最直接的就是“分數是越來越難拿”。不誇張地講，有相當大比例的烤鴨們寫作幾次奮力屠鴨還是停止在5.5分。經過對大量學員試卷或作業批改分析，目前還是很多對所謂“高分模板”有強烈的依賴感。
誠然，“高分句型”固然不錯，但並不是說將它們隨意用在邏輯上根本行不通的作文段落中去!
除此之外，我還發現中國的烤鴨們在雅思寫作時依然秉承著很多過去的雅思寫作模式，例如：開頭段(intro)一般至少寫三句話(背景，轉述題目和個人觀點)同時很多學生認為雅思寫作的開頭段字數控制在50個左右，也就是說開頭段的長度超過主體段(main body)。
事實上是這樣嗎，今天來給大家說說7+雅思開頭段的.那點事兒。
首先，開頭段至少寫三句話的這種說法本身就是對學生灌輸性的錯誤。西方國家的寫作對開頭段實際上沒有明確的規定，很多隻要你把你的個人觀點表示清晰即可。
For example：
Some people believe young adults should undertake unpaid work to help people in the community. Do you think it will bring more drawbacks to the community and young adults than benefits?
一看就是典型的“利弊題”，既然是問做“unpaid work”的利與弊，為了人生觀和個人價值觀，以及弘揚“正能量”肯定會選擇“利大於弊”。那麼既然態度這麼鮮明，開頭段不如直接了當一些，給考官眼前一亮的感覺。
Intro：
I definitely subscribe to the notion that young people should do voluntary or unpaid work to give a hand to the people in the community, because this practice will bring about twofold bonus.
一句話表明態度就好，尤其是definitely一詞表明態度的堅定。
其次，常提到的開頭段不要多於50個字或不要超過主體段的長度說法感到很是驚訝，如果是老師提到的，那麼這也太中國式的本本主義了甚至是誤人子弟。
好的雅思作文開頭段在西方是沒有對長短或字數要求。
再說一次，只要把你要說的觀點說清楚就好了。當然不要囉嗦。
For example：
Environmental hazards are often too great for particular countries or individuals to tackle. We have arrived at a point in time where the only way to lessen environmental problems is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
環保類的作文一直是雅思寫作中的重頭戲，本篇就是一個典型雅思辯論類。由於題目中出現了絕對詞“only”，我相信烤鴨們已看出這是一邊倒式文章，OK，那麼開頭段就一定在“50”字以內嗎?
Intro：
Environmental problems have reached such proportions that people feel international organizations must be set up to intervene in world affairs to resolve these problems. Whether this will resolve the problem which is very unlikely as international organizations are just an extension of human behavior. That is, if human conflicts cannot be resolved at home, then they are unlikely to be resolved at the international level. Nevertheless, international organizations do attract attention to the growing problem of pollution and the destruction of the environment. However, although I respect the aims of the international community to resolve the issue of environmental pollution and support their cause, I do not believe it is the best or only way to protect the environment; in fact, it is only a small part of what is needed in a global initiative.
