2016年雅思寫作模擬題及範文

在雅思考試的聽說讀寫當中，寫作無疑是眾多考生最薄弱的環節。為了幫助大家能順利備考，下面YJBYS小編為大家帶來2016年雅思寫作模擬題及範文，供大家參考學習，預祝大家考試順利!

　　試題(一)

有人認為給需要救助的人自己的幫助更加可取，有人認為給有需求的國家或國際援助組織提供經濟援助更加重要，討論兩種觀點，給出你的意見。

Although people in industrialized countries lead a high standard of living, it is undeniable that there are still 1.2 billion people living below the poverty line. In order to solve poverty-related problems, I feel that all kinds of help should be encouraged and respected.

Giving a helping hand to those who are in need in the local community seems reasonable. It is because even in the richest countries, there are still a lot of people, such as disabled people and orphanages, suffering from famine and extreme poverty. For this reason, it is easy and convenient for us to help our fellow citizens, such as donating food or clothing to them, so that we can see the result of our actions immediately. By contrast, it is rather difficult to track expenditure of international aids, which might result in corruption in some cases.

Those who donate money to domestic and international charities believe that the collection of money has a tremendous effect on the poor countries compared with other forms of help. This is because few people are able to donate a large amount of money to construct schools, hospitals and roads in poor areas. Instead, governments and charities can achieve this. International aids can also purchase vaccines which are available in developed countries by using the money raised worldwide and save millions children’s life.

In my view, minor proportion of donated money and other sorts of help should be appreciated equally as long as the money reaches to those who need it desperately. The government could run campaign and encourage door-to door help. At the same time, charitable organizations should make every penny count for donors.(word count：274)

　　試題(二)

有人認為經濟援助之重要的，有人認為實際的幫助和建議重要，你的觀點是什麼?

解析題目：2015年6月6日雅思考題中向有需要的國家提供幫助指的是一些國家在遭遇自然災害，經濟危機的'時候，應該給他們提供直接的援助，例如醫療隊，救援組織或者志願者。對立方觀點經濟援助指的是直接的捐助。本題為舊題重新，考察的是國家援助的方式。

作家立場：發達國家應該承擔對於發展中國家援助的責任。對比經濟援助，直接的幫助更加可取可行。

首段;背景介紹 + 爭議焦點 + 作家立場

二段：反方觀點的展開：

三段：正方觀點的展開：

It is not rare to see that some well-to-do countries like to give financial aid or other forms of assistance to poor ones. Conflicting ideas clash in whether or not economic donation is the best effective means of assistance. Speaking for myself, those developed countries should assume the responsibility of helping those countries, which are still suffering from the agonies of popular disease, poor education and undeveloped trade. However, financial aids have both its merits and demerits， other suitable ways of assistance should be considered.

Indeed, some arguments could be explored to justify that those well-off countries ought to give a financial aid to the poverty-stricken nations’ charities. For a start, it is out of the reason of humanism and could benefit the straitened nations directly. More precisely, financial beneficence from the developed countries could help to accelerate the construction of infrastructure and establishing more houses. Also, when some rich countries donate large sums of money to those needy countries, more job opportunities could be created and thus living standards of the poor countries could be enhanced.

Nonetheless, we should be alert to the possible risks of economic assistance. For one thing, it might make needy countries become over-dependent on the donors. For another, international aid might bright about possible political interference and economic exploitation. Apart from financial aids, there are still many other options available to assist the undeveloped nations. One way is by opening up trade barriers, which enables the poor countries to sell their goods. Another way is to forgive economic debts so that the self-supporting ability of the poor nations could be promoted. Eventually, the teams of volunteer teachers and doctors from rich countries could be dispatched to the impoverished countries to take the responsibilities of educational and medical assistance.

解析：It is not rare to see that …… 這一點很常見

解析：Conflicting ideas clash in whether or not 關於是否應該……，人們持有不同意見

解析：Financial aids have both its merits and demerits 經濟援助有利有弊

解析：Indeed, some arguments could be explored to justify that 的確，為證明……是合理的，我們是可以找到一些理由的

解析：……could benefit the straitened nations directly v可以使貧困國家直接受益

解析：Living standards of the poor countries could be enhanced 貧困國家的生活水平可以被提高

解析：It might make needy countries become over-dependent on the donors. 經濟援助也許會使貧困國家對於援助國更加依賴

解析：International aid might bright about possible political interference and economic exploitation. 國際援助也許會帶來政治干預和經濟掠奪

解析：open up trade barriers v開發貿易壁壘

解析：forgive economic debts v免除經濟債務

解析：The teams of volunteer teachers and doctors from rich countries could be dispatched to the impoverished countries 可以向貧困國家派駐教師和醫生。

　　試題(三)

範文主體思路分析：原因一：外來遊客的行為會激怒當地人，因為他們不遵守當地的習俗

對策一：政府可以在當地做引導，設定文化小貼士

原因二：外來遊客的旅行本身也會帶來他們的國家文化特徵，對於種族意識的強烈的國家是一種傷害

對策二：政府可以引導當地人改變想法，對這種行為持寬容態度。旅行更多的只是文化交流

Travelling abroad has become a new lifestyle nowadays. However, complaints about the potential negative effects of international travel have been sparked among the public in recent years. This essay will outline two main reasons for these complaints and provide certain measures to change the opinion.

First of all, it is a widespread phenomenon that foreign travellers might repel the local community because of their inappropriate languages and behaviour in some resorts. Due to the cultural differences, visitors’ behavior may break traditional rules in travel destinations sometimes. For example, a visitor will annoy an Indian when he passes food by his left hand. For this reason, the local government can take actions to provide more specific travelling tips in popular scene spots for foreign travellers.

In addition, more and more transnational travels will cause damage to the unique nature of a culture. Foreign visitors will bring not only tangible matters like food and clothes but also something intangible, such as their festivals or customs. In other words, these visitors are assimilating their country’s culture while they are travelling abroad, which will be bound to cause antipathy in racist society. Germany is a case in point. For this reason, the government can encourage locals to hold a tolerant attitude toward foreign arrivals as they have no common knowledge of local conventions in most times. Travelling is for cultural communication instead of invasion.

In conclusion, breaking conventions and cultural uniqueness are the two main factors leading to the bias regarding international tourism. Both governments and individuals should make an effort to change this phenomenon.