引導語：下面小編來和大家分享一下關於新GRE寫作的備考方法，希望能夠幫助到您。
一、有關GRE寫作範文
範文是一定要看的，看什麼。我建議，開始的時候，不要糾結於某某單詞的某某用法，大不了你寫的時候不用就是了。要大略的看，看作者是怎麼展開題目，從哪幾個方面入手，各自怎麼論證的。
很重要的一點是，不要迷信範文。沒有任何證據表明你看到的這篇範文出自一位邏輯學大師的手，即便確實如此，對於同一問題有不同的見解這是再正常不過的事情。思路可以借鑑，但千萬不要僵化。
與此本質相同的另一個方法是，請別人改作文，就觀點改或就文字改，按個人情況取捨。
二、文章開始點明中心句
在每一段開始的第一行，最好能明確地表達你想說什麼，也就是中心句。
這做法雖然死板，但往往有奇效。特別是對自己邏輯推理不是很有信心的各位，說清楚了，沒說全面總比說都沒說清楚要好。
三、寫作這個東西其實是相通的
我們中的很大一部分在大學聯考結束後恐怕很少再寫這麼長的，同時主題又相對深刻的文字。英文只是一個表達方式，而論證過程則和中文沒有任何區別。如 果實在覺得難以上手，不妨先試試寫一篇自己認為很深刻的中文文章看看。在邏輯和思想方面，這樣的訓練方式會有奇效，同時對於心理是一個不小的鼓舞。
四、專門練習句子
如果真的想兼顧文字，不如在練邏輯練累的時候(我知道很容易累，很枯燥)，專門拿出一點時間去寫一些句子，效果更好。
如果說GRE作文模版的話，這樣就足夠了。模版這個東西，背太多沒好處，太容易侷限思維，還有雷同的風險。
五、培養找到錯誤的能力
還要說明一點，以上是針對整個AW而言。對於argument，特別需要注意的是培養找到錯誤的.能力。
具體方法是，閱讀一定量的題目。這樣的好處有二：
1.通過閱讀題目，只找錯誤來訓練。
2.沒有誰能保證argument裡面不會出現一個你不認識的單詞，萬一是個關鍵詞，那可就……
argument其實和issue也是相通的，鍛鍊一者的同時另一者一定也會提高，所以不要糾結浪費時間的問題。
六、關於機經
我的意見是，反正寫什麼都是寫，不如按照機經寫。當然，如果能寫很多很多，那我的意見沒有什麼參考價值。
延伸閱讀：GRE寫作Argument的7種邏輯錯誤
1、結論無據(gratuitous assumption)
The author falsely depends on gratuitousassumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to supportthis assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it ismore likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling outsuch possibility.
2、無因果聯絡
The author commits a fallacy of causaloversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred beforeB, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses thepositive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the factthat A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But thisis fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have beenconsidered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these eventsor perhaps B is caused by D.
3、樣本不足(Insufficient-sample)
The evidence the author provides isinsufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logicallyunsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a fewrecent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless itcan be shown that A1 is representative of all A.
4、二者擇一(Either-Orchoice)
The author assumes that AA and BB aremutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ver, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Commonsense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
5、錯誤類比 (based on a false analogy ) <橫向>
The argument rests on the assumptionthat A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, sincealthough there are points of comparison between A and B, there is muchdissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likelymuch more difficult for B to do....
6、時地全等 all thingsare equal <縱向>
The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact thathappened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion author assumes without justification that the background conditions haveremained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it isnot clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same asthey used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
7、可疑調查(survey isdoubtful)
The poll cited by the author is toovague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll,who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking informationabout the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it isimpossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 personswere surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion d be highlysuspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kindof interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of thesurvey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
