閱讀理解在英語考試中有著舉足輕重的`地位，下面是小編給大家準備的會考英語考前的閱讀理解的專項訓練，大家一起來學習一下吧!
第一篇：
Unless we spend money to spot(認出，發現) and prevent asteroids(小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say some scientists.
Asteroids are bigger versions of the meteoroids(流星體) that race across the night sky. Most orbit the sun far from Earth and don’t threaten us. But there are also thousands of asteroids whose orbits put them on a collision course with Earth.
But $500 million worth of new telescopes right now, then spend $10 million a year for the next 25 years to locate most of the space rocks. By the time we spot a fatal one, the scientists say, we’ll have a way to change its course.
Is it worth it? Two things experts consider when judging any risk are (i) How likely the event is; (2) How bad the consequences if the event occurs. Experts think an asteroid big enough to destroy lots of life might strike Earth once every 500,000 years. Sounds pretty rare but if one did fall. It would be the end of the world. “If we don’t take care of these bid asteroids, they’ll take care of us,” says one scientist. “it’s that simple.”
The cure, though, might be worse than the disease. Do we really want fleets(艦隊，車隊) of nuclear weapons sitting around on Earth? “the world has less fear from doomsday(毀滅性) rocks than from a great nuclear fleet set against them.” Said a New York Times article.
1. What does the passage say about asteroids and meteoroids?
A. They are heavenly bodies different in composition.
B. They are heavenly bodies similar in nature.
C. They are more asteroids than meteoroids.
D. Asteroids are more mysterious than meteoroids.
2. What do scientists say about the collision of an asteroid with Earth?
A. It is very unlikely but the danger exists.
B. Such a collision might occur once every 25 years.
C. Collisions of smaller asteroids with Earth occur more often than expected.
D. It’s still too early to say whether such a collision might occur.
3. What do people think of the suggestion of using nuclear weapons to alter the course of asteroids?
A. It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem.
B. It may create more problems than it might solve.
C. It is a waste of money because a collision of asteroids with Earth is very unlikely.
D. Further research should be done before it is proved applicable.
4. We can conclude from the passage that __
A. While pushing asteroids off course nuclear weapons would destroy the world.
B. Asteroids racing across the night sky are likely to hit Earth in the near future.
C. The worry about asteroids can be left to future generations since it is unlikely to happen in our lifetime. 資料來源：南方學科網
D. Workable solutions still have to be found to prevent a collision of asteroids with Earth.
h of the following best describes the author’s tone in this passage?
A. Optimistic(樂觀的) ical(批評的) C. Objective(客觀的) D. Arbitrary(武斷的)
第二篇：
The law says that women should have the chance of doing the same jobs as men and earn the same as them.
The reality is very different. Women lose because, 25 years after the Equal Pay Act, many of them still get paid less than men.
They lose because they do lower-paid jobs which men just won’t consider. And they lose they are the ones who interrupt a career to have children.
All this is reported in an independent study ordered by the Government’s women’s unite.
The biggest problem isn’t equal pay in work places such as factories. It is a sort of work women do.
Make a list of low-paid of jobs_ then consider who does them.
Try nurses, secretaries, cleaner, clerks, teachers in primary schools, dinner ladies, and child care helpers. Not a lot of men among that group, are there?
Yet some of those jobs are really important. Surely no one would deny that about nurses and teachers, for a start.
So why do we reward the people who do them so poorly? There can be only one answer--- because they are women.
This is not going to be put right overnight. But the Government, which employs a lot of them,, and other bosses have to make a start.
It is disgraceful(可恥的) that we have gone into the 21st Century still treating women like second-class citizens.
1. Women should have the chance of doing the same jobs and be paid equally as men ____.
A. after 25 years
B. according to the law
C. as a result of the Equal Pay Act
D. because women are as strong as men
2. We can learn from the text what the problem really matters is ____.
A. that the women interrupt a career to have children
B. what sort of work women do
C. because they are women
D. what an unfair pay women get in workplaces.
3. Which of the following best describes the writer’s idea?
A. Women should get equal pay for equal work to that of men.
