有些人認為在大學裡學習是事業成功的最佳路線，而另一些人認為，最好是畢業後直接找工作。討論兩種觀點並給出你的觀點。面是小編整理的雅思英語作文，大家可以參考參考。
題目：Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
範文：
When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.
The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.
For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.
參考翻譯
當他們完成學業，青少年面臨的困境，是否找到工作或繼續教育。雖然放學後找工作有一些好處，但我認為最好還是上大學。
放學後直接開始工作的選擇是有吸引力的幾個原因。許多年輕人想盡快賺錢。這樣，他們可以獨立，他們將能夠負擔得起自己的`房子或開始一個家庭。就他們的事業而言，決定找工作而不繼續學習的年輕人可能進步得更快。他們將有機會獲得真正的經驗和學習相關的實用技能，他們選擇的專業。這可能會導致晉升和成功的事業。
另一方面，我認為學生繼續學習更有益處。首先，許多職業需要學歷。例如，不具備相關學位就不可能成為醫生、老師或律師。因此，大學畢業生有機會獲得更多更好的工作機會，他們往往比那些資歷較少的人掙得更高的薪水。其次，就業市場競爭日益激烈，有時有數百名申請人在一個職位的公司。沒有大學或大學學歷的年輕人將無法參加競爭。
基於上述原因，在我看來，如果學生在學業上繼續深造，他們更可能在事業上取得成功。
雅思作文範文【2】題目：Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
範文：
It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.
There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.
In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.
參考翻譯
在不久的將來，一些少數民族語言可能會消失。雖然可以認為政府可以通過允許這種情況發生來省錢，但我認為這些語言應該得到保護和保護。
拯救少數民族語言被視為浪費金錢的原因有幾個。首先，如果只有少數人只講一種語言，就需要昂貴的教育課程來確保更多的人學習它，國家將不得不支付設施，教師和市場。這筆錢可能會更好地用於其他公共服務。其次，只有一種語言的國家要便宜得多，效率也更高。各國政府可以削減與各少數民族溝通的各種費用。
儘管有上述論點，我認為政府應該盡力保護語言不太廣泛的語言。語言不僅僅是一種交流手段，它與說話的人的文化身份有著重要的聯絡。如果一種語言消失了，整個生活方式就會消失，我們將失去豐富的文化多樣性，使社會更加有趣。通過花錢保護少數民族語言，政府也可以保護傳統，習俗和行為，是一個國家的歷史的一部分。
總之，如果我們允許少數民族語言消失，短期內可能會省錢，但從長遠來看，這將對我們的文化遺產產生極為不利的影響。
