英語四級考試就要來臨了，各位同學複習得怎樣了呢?下面是yjbys網小編提供給大家關於英語四級閱讀匹配練習題，希望對大家的備考有所幫助。
Being Objective on Climate Change
week，Craig Rucker,a climate-change skeptic and the executive director of a nonprofit organization called the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow(CFACT)，tweeted a quotation supposedly taken from a 1922 edition of the Washington Post：“Within a few years it is predicted due to ice melt the sea will rise&make most coastal cities uninhabitable.”The intent，of course，was to poke fun at current headlines about climate change.
er’s organization is a member ofthe Cooler Heads Coalition，an umbrella organization operated by the Competitive Enterprise Institute，a nonprofit that prides itself on its opposition to environmental er himself is part of a network of bloggers，op-cd writers，and policy-shop executives who argue that climate change is either a hoax or all example of left-wing acing old newspaper clips is one of their favorite also make substantive arguments about climate policy,but the sniping may be more e is no stronger rhetorical tool than ridicule.
this case，Ruckcr’s ridicule seems r spending a few minutes poking around online，1 was able to find both the Washington Post article and the longer SourCe material that it came from—a weather report issued by the ul in Bergen，Norway,and sent to the State Department on october 1 0，1 report didn’t say anything about coasts being isn’t ntists wete smart back then，too,and they knew that melting sea ice wouldn’t appreciably raise sea more than a melting ice cube raises the level of water in a glass.
er ultimately corrected his tweet once commenters pointed out the ugh Twitter,he informed me that he had taken the line from a Washington Times op—ed by Richard Rahn，a senior fellow at the Cato I contacted Rahn’s office.a press representative acknowledged that Rahn had copied the quote from other bloggers and columnists;the fabricated sentence appears in articles at and fabricated line seems to have been ed around the original article has been circulating online since 2007.
E. The statement about rising sea levels aside，1 922 really was a strange period in the Svalbard area described by the weather islands lie halfway between Norway and the North Pole,at a latitude that puts them several hundred miles farther north than Barrow,alaska.“The Arctic seems to be warming up.”the report August of that year,a geologist near the island of Spitsbergen sailed as far north as eighty-one minutes in ice-free was highly previous several summers had likewise been populations had moved farther north，and formerly unseen stretches of coast were now accessible.
are we to take from this historical evidence?A central tenet for Rucker and his colleagues is mat today’s retreat。warming surface temperatures，and similar observations are short-lived anomalies of a kind that often happened in the past—and that overzealous scientists and gullible media are quick to drum up crises where none rite examples include numerous newspaper articles from the nties that predicted the advent of a new ice 's possible to find articles from nearly every decade of the past century that seem to imply information about the climate that turned out to be premature or wrong.
1922 article has been quoted repeatedly by Rucker’s comrades-in-arms since its 2007 rebirth in the Washington nearly that long，scientists have been n Schmidt，a climate modeler and the deputy director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies，points out that what was an anomaly in 1922 is now the norm：the waters near Spitsbergen are clear of ice at the end of every important，long-term temperature and sea-ice records indicate that the dramatic sea-ice retreat in the early ties was also occurred locally around svalbard—the unusual conditions didn’t even encompass the whole Norwegian Sea，let alone the rest of the Arctic.
H. 0ver the weekend，after retracting his previous tweet，Rucker posted a link to a blog item about a different one a 1932 New York Times eighty-year-old headline reads，“The Next Great Deluge Forecast By Science：Melting Polar Ice Caps to Raise the Level of the Seas and Flood the Continents.”That one sounded juicy,and，indeed，this time the text was correct：that really is what the headline ically,the lcad researcher cited in the piece was a German scientist named Alfred Wegener,who has sometimes been considered a hero of climate-change deniers for a completely different ner is known for proposing the phenomenon of continental drift starting around the First Wbrid War,The idea was ridiculed before gaining acceptance in the nineteen-sixties，once
ample evidence had been ner’s lifc story,then，is used to support the idea that the small number of researchers in the field who downplay the risk of anthropogenic climate change will one day prevail.
reality,the potential for anthropogenic global warming was being discussed earlier than continental took even longer to gain wide versatile Professor Wegener was a geophysicist and polar researcher who spent much of his career studying meteorology in Greenland，and trying to unlock the secrets of the Earth’s elevated place in the current climate-change debate is
abstracted from history.
any case，it’s not clear that the bloggers linking to the 1932 article read much beyond the article does discuss a collapse of the ice sheets that would raise sea levels by more than a hundred feet—but it says that event lies thirty to forty thousand years in the e’s nothing wrong with examining old newspaper articles for clues about climate conditions in the timate climate researchers look at historical documents of all ver,a good-faith effort to arrive at the truth would not rely on cherry-picking catchy would require considering the context and looking at all the the very wouldn’t allow for deliberate distortions.A prediction that the ice caps might melt by the year 42，000 is hardly all example of climate alarmism.
ke melting ice in the glass，the melting sea ice cannot easily raise sea level.
er maintains that the ge is just a terrible fantasy of the left-wing or even a totally distrustful matter.
is fair to search for every piece of evidence to approach the truth without distortion.
for Rucker,the clear purpose of tweeting this quotation is to laugh at the articles about climate change.
various unusual phenomena about climate change are merely non-exist alarms claimed by the scientists and media，would be short-lived.
drastic sea-ice melt occurred around Svalbard was only local and limited.
is normal for the waters at northern latitude 8 1 degrees，29 minutes to be covered with ice.
is embraced that the number of climate-change researchers will be multiplied one day.
is ironic for the leading figure of climate-change opponents to quote this piece.
reality,the universal information in articles about climate change is eventually proved to be unbelievable.
ke melting ice in the glass，the melting sea ice can not easily raise sea level.與杯中的融冰不同，海中的融冰不會使海面快速升高。
er maintains that the climate change is just a terrible fantasy of the left-wing or even a totally distrustful matter.洛克認為氣候變化的論點不過是左派的糟糕的幻想，甚至根本就是一個騙局。
fairto searchfor everypiece ofevidence to approach the truth without distortion.努力尋找證據，真實地靠近真相，這點是不可爭議的
for Rucker,the clear purpose of tweeting this quotation is to laugh at the articles about climate change.洛克微博這條引語的用意很明顯是在嘲笑有關氣候變化的文章。
various unusual phenomena about climate change are merely t alarms claimed by the scientists and media，would be short-lived.各種有關氣候變化的非正常現象不過是短暫的'，是科學家和媒體所宣稱的，本不存在的危言聳聽。
drastic sea-ice melt occurred around Sval bard was only local and limited.發生在斯瓦爾巴特群島周圍劇烈的海冰融化現象只是區域性的。
is normal for the waters at northern latitude 81 degrees，29 minutes to be covered with ice.照理說，北緯81度29分的水域應該是結冰的。
is embraced that the number of climate-change researchers will be multiplied one day.終有一天，對氣候變化研究的人員數量會不斷增加。
is ironic for the leading figure ofclimate-change opponents to quote this piece.作為氣候變化反對者的英雄人物，引用這篇文章是很諷刺的。
universal information in articles about climate change is eventually proved to be unbelievable.事實上，大量關於氣候變化的資訊最後都被證實是不可信的。
