業精於勤，荒於嬉;行成於思，毀於隨。以下本站小編整理的公共英語pets5寫作範文，希望對大家有所幫助，更多資訊請關注應屆畢業生網!
Since the 1960s, debates have been fueled on the ideal means of communication. Some observers, free lancers and columnists in particular, often emphasize that the more friends one has on line, the fewer one has in his life. However, through decades of practice and observation, it turns out that their statement has many restrictions.
Admittedly, the idea held by those observers does contain an element of truth. For example, along with the computer boom, Internet, the gem of twentieth century scientific technology, is playing an increasingly important role in the means of communication. But these arguers tend to ignore two other essential aspects. First, they fail to take into account the possibility that a variety of technical devices are available. As a result, people can resort to telephones or faxes to maintain a more intimate human relationship. In this sense, the popularity of Internet is not always synonymous to the emotional isolations between people. Second, the arguers’ assertion doesn’t provide sufficient data to narrow down the exact number of computer users who seldom contact their parents or colleagues. Therefore, any further conclusion addressing the problem must be based on thorough investigation. As a matter of fact, dinner parties, celebrating parties as well as other social activities always successfully bring people together. In this respect, the upsurge of electric contact is not the sole hallmark of the decrease of closed n reasons above, the argument above, under a careful examination, turns out to be groundless in its hasty conclusion.
In conclusion, the arguers’ evidence lends little credible support to their claim. To persuade people that the more friends one has on line, the fewer friends one has in his life, the arguers would need to provide clear evidence, sufficient data and thorough cost-benefit analysis of alternatives.(297 words)
譯文：
自1960年代以來,爭論一直在推動理想的通訊手段。一些觀察人士,特別是自由槍騎兵和專欄作家,經常強調的更多的朋友,更少的人在他的生活中。然而,通過幾十年的實踐和觀察,事實證明,他們的宣告有許多限制。
誠然,這些觀察人士持有的想法幷包含一個元素的真理。例如,隨著計算機的繁榮,網際網路,二十世紀科學技術的`寶石,發揮著日益重要的角色的溝通方式。但這些爭論者傾向於忽視其他兩個基本方面。首先,他們沒有考慮各種技術裝置的可能性。因此,人們可以採取電話或傳真來維持一個更親密的人際關係。從這個意義上說,網際網路的普及並不總是代表人與人之間情感的分解動作。第二,辯論者的論斷沒有提供足夠的資料來縮小計算機使用者的確切數字很少接觸他們的父母或同事。因此,任何進一步的結論解決問題必須基於徹底的調查。事實上,宴會,慶祝聚會以及其他社會活動總是成功地把人們團結在一起。在這方面,電接觸的高潮並不是唯一的標誌的減少封閉的朋友。鑑於以上原因,上面的論點,在仔細檢查下,草率的結論被證明是毫無根據的。
總之,辯論者的證據卻很少可信支援他們的說法。要說服人們,更多的朋友,朋友越少人在他的生活中,辯論者需要提供明確的證據,足夠的資料和徹底的替代品的成本效益分析。
