打算要參加GMAT考試的朋友們對於寫作部分的備考技巧十分關注，以下是小編為大家搜尋整理的2017年GMAT作文段落分佈指導,希望能給大家帶來幫助!更多精彩內容請及時關注我們應屆畢業生考試網!
簡單的說就是，作者說一段話，然後你負責用最短的時間炮轟這段話的邏輯錯誤，結論就是這篇argument簡直就是胡扯!一般全文寫4-5段，字數往多了寫，400字左右最好：
首段---(作者的結論/建議+作者得出這個結論/建議的邏輯+我覺得這個AA是廢話)注意：複述作者的結論邏輯的時候儘量使用一些替換詞和變換句式，不要照抄原題. e.g. In this argument, the author concludes/suggests justify his claim, the author cites the facts her examination reveals that this argument is indefensible in several critical aspects.
中間2-3段---每段攻擊一個邏輯點，溪予認為儘量把作者提出的每個論點都攻擊到，major reasoning errors花多點筆墨，minor的可以幾個放在一段寫，但是不能不寫，因為要體現邏輯的完整和嚴密性。
最後一段---總結全文，重新強調一編這篇文章是胡言亂語!但後提出改進意見。e.g. In conclusion, this argument is fallacious unless more probable factors are considered and ruled out. To strengthen his allegation, the author must first prove tionally, more convincing evidence should be provided to show that...
【相關閱讀】GMAT寫作邏輯邏輯因果練習的方法解析
為了讓大家能夠更好的學習GMAT的寫作方法，就需要大家對邏輯方面的知識有一定的掌握，下面就為大家分享GMAT寫作邏輯因果聯絡的方法，希望能幫到大家。
例：An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private group that is training recruits to fight against the Balaland Republic. The U.S. Neutrality Act plainly forbids US citizens from engaging in military campaigns against any nation with which we are not at war. Since no war has been declared between the United States and the Balaland Republic, we should bring charges against these fanatics, who are in open defiance of the law.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
首先，讀GMAT考試邏輯題題幹，知道這是weaken題。請立刻在腦海中想到答案就是最有效“反對”前提(後文均用“因為”代替)的一個。按此思路，我們就要找到“因為”。
此篇GMAT邏輯題原文的意思：
因為：某團體組織人在非戰時進行對抗B國的軍事訓練;並且，法律禁止美國公民在非戰爭狀態下參與對他國的軍事對抗行為;
所以：該組織應被調查和指控。
GMAT攻略邏輯題的'解法思路：我們要反對“因為”，那麼答案一定要對“因為”的內容進行質疑。由於這裡的“因為”有兩句，所以為我們篩選質疑哪個“因為”增加了難度。但實際上，我們要質疑的不是法律，所以，第 二個因為就可以排除在答案之外。因此，你就要去在5個選項中找存在對第一個因為產生質疑的選項。
答案：a. The Balaland
Republic is currently engaged in a bloody and escalating civil war.
b. Diplomatic relation between US and Balaland were severed last year.
c. The recruits are being trained to fight only in the event the US goes to war against Balaland.
d. The training of recruits is funded not by US citizens, but rather by a consortium of individuals from abroad.
e. Charges cannot be brought against the private group that is training the recruits unless an investigation is first launched.
很顯然，c 恰好是用“該團體只是訓練人員已備戰時使用，並非是在非戰爭狀態下對B國進行軍事對抗”反對了第一個因為，所以直接選擇就好了。
當然，我們最好也去看一下其他GMAT邏輯題的選項，以防備自己的疏漏。a b選項不能質疑，反而使支援，c在文章中沒提到，e和第一個因為不相干。而且原文第一句就說了是investigation，並沒有錯。因此，只有c 正確。
GMAT邏輯題的解法林林總總，不過用因果聯絡的方法解題也是很迅速的，這種GMAT邏輯題的解法在很多場合很奏效，大家可以參考運用到GMAT邏輯題的實戰中去。
